Sunday, October 29, 2017

FULL DARK: An Anthology is now out!


Add FULL DARK to your Goodreads shelf here

Available on Amazon and B&N.

It's October 30th, which means that FULL DARK: An Anthology is now officially OUT!


What happens in the dark will come to light.

Full Dark is a collection of eleven short works with impressive depth and range. Twisted tales of ghosts, villains, and the paranormal await you—mystery, heinous fantasy, and pure suspense. Acclaimed and award-winning authors as well as a few talented newcomers have joined forces to be your guide. Venture into the dark if you dare.

Just A Matter Of Time by Loni Townsend
Forerunner by David Powers King
Taking Care Of You by Carrie Butler
The Apartment by Lisa Buie-Collard
The Caricature by Nick Wilford
Shifting Sands by Elizabeth Seckman
Shadows Falling On Rainbows by Celeste Holloway
Meringue, Murder or Marzipan by Tonja Drecker
Haunted Lake by Michelle Athy
Soul Coin by Laura Rich
Retribution by Melissa Maygrove

FULL DARK is a benefit anthology. 100% of the proceeds will be donated to the Gary Sinise Foundation, an organization that does many wonderful things for our country's active military, its veterans, and the countless first responders who sacrifice so much to keep us safe.

Published by Obisidian Books. 



Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Why I Love Roger MacKenzie

Outlander season three has begun--I'm patiently awaiting the airing of episode 6 in another week. I read all eight Outlander novels in 2014-2015, not long after TV version began.

And yes, Jamie Fraser and Claire Randall Fraser loom large in the Outlander world--the time-crossing lovers who have very odd adventures and associate with an ever-increasing growing cast of characters.

But I realized about halfway into the series that my favorite character in Outlander world is Roger Wakefield MacKenzie, who [spoiler] is Jamie and Claire's daughter Brianna's love interest and eventual husband.



Over the last year, I've been doing a very slow re-read of the Outlander books, but I've only been re-reading the Roger and Brianna parts. It's a very different series when you only read their parts, much less improbable adventure and more two twentieth century people living in the eighteenth century and all the complications that would ensue from that. Jamie--and Claire, in a lot of ways--are both bigger than life and they're great characters, I like reading about them, but my Outlander book boyfriend is totally Roger.

Roger is, in 1968, a young Oxford professor of history. When he re-meets Claire and meets Brianna--who he's immediately interested in--Roger becomes involved in Claire's time-travel-and-Jamie-related dilemma and he helps Claire find records proving that Jamie lived past Culloden--and to trace him as much as they can through history.

Roger and Brianna have a slow-burn romance through at least three of the books before they both go through the stones to the eighteenth century and in the eighteenth century, they have a fairly atypical relationship for that time because they're actually from the twentieth century. There are characters here and there who seem surprised or concerned that Roger doesn't "rein in" Brianna more, but Roger loves Bree, even if he is mystified by her quite a lot.

Because Roger is a historian, he's adaptable to the eighteenth century, but also fascinated by the history happening around him. As he integrates into eighteenth century frontier life, Roger grapples with the fact that he has few transferable skills to eighteenth century farm life. He didn't grow up on a farm, so all the farm chores are new to him. There aren't many positions for a history professor in the backcountry, so Roger needs to find his way to where the farmwork doesn't seem so hard--and he finds his calling as more and more people settle on Jamie Fraser's land grant.

Roger is also a really empathetic person. And he's musical. which is really endearing.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Pursue the Unknown End by Emily Steers: An Author Interview

Last year, a college classmate released her debut novel Collecting The Constellations, a contemporary  mystery-adventure story. The sequel to that book, PURSUE THE UNKNOWN END, was released on September 1, 2017.


Fresh off their life-altering trip to Kathmandu, Charlotte and Rory left New York City for the relatively quiet confines of Tilly's Texas ranch. On the day of their wedding, a mysterious gift arrives on the doorway, soliciting the pair to uncover the secrets of its confines A.S.A.P.


The contents of the box send the pair to Boston, the former Hub of the Solar System, to dig through America's complex history of business, representation, and human rights. 


But as Charlotte and Rory get closer to uncovering one of Boston's best-held secrets, new revelations about their relationship come to light.

Add Pursue the Unknown End to your Goodreads shelf. You can get both books in Emily's Antiquities series on Amazon for $1.98.

On with the interview!

1. Pursue the Unknown End is the second book in the Antiquities series and the sequel to Collecting the Constellations. How soon after writing the first book did you start writing the second? 

Truthfully, it took months. The actual effort and turmoil of self-publishing COLLECTING THE CONSTELLATIONS really took it out of me! But I always knew that the adventures that Charlotte and Rory went on couldn't stop at one book, so I spent a lot of time figuring out how I could create a new structure around which they could continue. COLLECTING THE CONSTELLATIONS ends, and PURSUE THE UNKNOWN END starts, with them both in such an unmoored, limbo state with their careers and lives. I love books about transitional periods that don't really revolve around the typical moments of change– marriage, birth, death, etc. Life transitions happen so much more frequently than we'd like to admit. 

And transitional times are rife for conflict--and as you say, they happen much more than we'd like to admit. 

Collecting the Constellations took place in Nepal and India--places you haven't been, right? Pursue the Unknown End takes place in and around Boston, which I know you know very well 'cause we went to college there. What made you want to bring the setting closer to home this time around?

As much as I've always wanted to go to Nepal, I haven't been. So it was a really fun project to research everything that happens in Kathmandu– and let me tell you, EVERYTHING is researched, even down to the color of polo shirts they wear at the Indian version of Target that I reference toward the end of COLLECTING THE CONSTELLATIONS. Believe it or not, that's all real, even though a lot of readers thought I was making it up. 

Boston was actually a bit of a mental backlash to the criticism I got about putting Charlotte in such an "exotic" location in the first book. Even though I'd researched every last detail about Nepal and India in CONSTELLATIONS, a bunch of people were like, "That's not real! That can't be real!" So, I thought: what's better known than one of the oldest cities in America? And what's more mundane than the place where you went to college? Of course, the age of Boston lends itself to mystery– I still learn weirdo tidbits about the city that make me realize how old it is. That bit about the grave sites and pathways? Totally true. 

I like cemeteries. I have very clear memories of walking past and into the graveyards in Boston. Oddly enough, they were one of my favorite parts of living in Boston for the three years I was in college. What was your favorite part of writing Boston?

I lived, for a brief time as a child, north of Boston, near Gloucester. Then, obviously, I spent many years in the Back Bay while attending Emerson. I know enough about the southern Cape and the whaling industry due to my parents' current hometown near Mystic, CT, where there's a living museum dedicated to old ships and the fishing and whaling industries of New England in the 1800s. I think when you're a kid and growing up there, you forget how small New England is, and you certainly can't grasp just how much of America is still based on colonial norms and means. 

While at Emerson, I lived in the smallest apartment ever in the Back Bay and worked in a few different parts of Boston– in Faneuil Hall/North End and closer to the Fenway as well. I walked everywhere– past the burial grounds, past the plaques of information, past the statues, past the museums. Walking the same paths every day for three years (I graduated early), you do come to memorize the details that you see. Also, I think it's funny that while most of New England is deeply rooted in "townie" culture, Boston is incredibly diverse (well, compared to non-city New England). I didn't want Charlotte to come in contact with too many Boston natives. "Scholarly Boston" is a fascinating culture. 

As someone who is a bit of a conservationist and certainly an animal rights activist, the history of the whaling industry in America is mind-boggling to me. It was like Silicon Valley is today, but a million times as disgusting and dangerous. But, as it's touched upon in the book, the whaling industry was at its height during a huge upheaval in American cultural norms, too– black freed men were allowed to work, for pay, on ships; and certainly the abolitionist/anti-south sentiment of Northerners was coming to a head, too. I'm not saying the North is a paragon of virtuous racial relations– OH, SO FAR FROM IT– but it was always an interesting time to me. Of course, this was a time of gender relations upheaval, too. Basically, Boston was a freaking cultural mess at that time. Feels familiar. 
Example of scrimshaw
From Wikipedia


The scrimshaw--and whole mystery around it--felt more intricate this time around. Do you remember what inspired that part of the book?

I wanted something that was about the complete, artistic opposite as the archaeological piece of the first book. COLLECTING THE CONSTELLATIONS revolved around a sapphire blade. And to me, a piece of folk art made from a tooth really fit the bill. The mystery of CONSTELLATIONS revolved around gods and wealth and the cosmos while the scrimshaw of PURSUE THE UNKNOWN END exalts the mundane, and very, very ordinary people. Even though most of the sailors at that time were of some sort of Protestant sect, there's not a whole lot of God depicted in scrimshaw. You think to yourself, "What kind of secret could this possibly bear?" and you know it has to do with personal, intimate secrets, and not secrets of the universe.

I was giving Rory a lot of side eye toward the end of the book (as if he didn't know who he was marrying! Honestly!). There's another one coming in this series, right?

Oh, definitely! It's funny– I got a bit of flak after the first book for making Rory a true female stand-in in an adventure series. Without a doubt, he's just kind of there to be hot and make Charlotte be the hero. So I thought to myself, "You want a male character that's more real? You're not going to like what you read!"

What else are you working on?

I just finished the rough draft of the first book in a new book series. VIVIAN VALENTINE GETS HER MAN is about a Girl Friday whose P.I. goes missing, and she has to finish his case– all while trying to figure out what happened to her boss. It's so fun to write, as it takes place in perfect world for a noir-ish mystery– New York City in 1950. I just love writing smart-aleky women. But I'm going to be querying agents on this soon, and hoping I can go a more traditional publishing route with it.

Thank you so much Emily for answering my questions and stopping by!


Emily (Steers) Edwards is one of the few writers based in Los Angeles who doesn’t write screenplays. With an extensive background in corporate copywriting and editorial, she has written for several national publications and keeps her own lifestyle blog. Emily is a graduate of Emerson College’s Writing, Literature, and Publishing program. She resides in Pasadena with her husband and their two dogs. To keep in contact, follow her on Twitter @MsEmilyEdwardsInstagramFacebook, or on her blog, Yankee Smartass.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

IWSG October




It is the first Wednesday in October, which means it's time for IWSG DayThe awesome co-hosts for the October 4 posting of the IWSG are Olga Godim, Chemist Ken, Jennifer Hawes, and Tamara Narayan!

What insecurities do I have this month? Well, I have one project I'm losing interest in, but trying to persevere and finish. I have another project idea bearing ideas for a series and characters and plot.

Which brings me around to this month's IWSG question:

Have you ever slipped any of your personal information into your characters, either by accident or on purpose?

I remember my theater major friends in college talking about how they had to "find their way in" to a character. The longer I write, the more characters I come up with, the more I realize that I, too, need to find my way in to a character, even if our circumstances are utterly different. 

For my historical characters, the personal information we share isn't very personal at all, if we indeed share anything in common. 

For the few contemporary characters I've written to completion, the problem is usually that we have too much in common. I'm generally more comfortable in historicals because the time period and such dictates that my characters and I are very different people. In contemporaries, I've had a harder time not making the characters into fictionalized versions of myself or friends, which is really annoying. I don't even do it on purpose. It's just mostly turned out that way. 

But I guess there's always a little something in my characters of myself: a particular point of view, a dry sense of humor, an emotional reaction, cultural similarities. They're more intangible and only people who know me really well would be able to read one of those and realize that that's from me and not the character; or they may not know that that little bit of information is from me at all.

So, of course, the new project series idea is a contemporary and I am determined to make sure that a) these stories are outlined because I'm tired of this mid-manuscript confusion and b) I want to develop my characters as people on their own.

The upside of contemporary? Not having to dive into tons of research. I can watch YouTube videos as research. Oh, my God, I'm so excited!